Eyes in the Sky Guiding Smarter City Planning

By Eric Kamande

Earth-observation satellites, once the realm of weather bureaus and defence agencies, are fast becoming a practical tool for city halls. Two recent breakthroughs make the difference: daily, low-cost imagery from rapid-revisit constellations, and AI models that turn raw pixels into zoning-grade evidence within hours. Instead of dispatching inspectors or running drone campaigns, planners now subscribe to space-based feeds that pinpoint unpermitted buildings, shrinking green space, and flood-plain risks.

Planet Labs, founded in San Francisco by Will Marshall and Robbie Schingler, operates more than 200 small satellites that photograph every landmass on Earth once a day. In April 2025, Germany’s Federal Ministry for Digital Affairs signed a €240 million deal for four years of Planet’s AI-labelled imagery. The country’s 81 cities above 50,000 residents will receive daily maps highlighting construction violations, shoreline changes, and post-storm damage, with enough detail to trigger inspections without a single site visit.

Virginia-based BlackSky, led by Brian O’Toole, runs a 30-satellite fleet that revisits the same coordinates up to 15 times a day. During the January 2025 Danube floods, the European Emergency Response Coordination Centre fed BlackSky’s change-detection layers into its logistics dashboards, gaining an estimated six hours on sand-bag deployments and evacuation routes – crucial time when river levels are still rising.

In Indonesia, Satellogic, led by Emiliano Kargieman and co-headquartered in Buenos Aires and Montevideo, focuses on affordability. It’s shoebox-sized craft captures 70 cm imagery at a fraction of legacy prices. A multi-year agreement signed in February 2025 lets Jakarta monitor illegal land clearing on its outskirts; weekly AI reports already show the capital losing 2 to 3%of vegetative cover each year and identify the parcels responsible.

Three lessons stand out for planners:

• Pixels need context; All three projects bundle machine-learning annotations, tree-canopy percentages, surface-water outlines, and unauthorised foundations, because raw imagery turns to shelf-ware if planning departments must label it by hand. Budgets should reflect this: the line item is “analysis as a service”, not just satellite pictures.
• Refresh rate beats razor-sharp resolution for trends; Daily three-metre data will reveal a creeping informal settlement long before a monthly 30-cm snapshot, because the signal is in the trend. Conversely, ultra-high-definition imagery earns its keep in one-off audits, say, counting solar panels for a rebate programme. Matching cadence to the problem is more important than chasing the sharpest picture.
• Integration trumps novelty; All three providers deliver outputs in open-standard GIS formats, allowing cities to drop the layers straight into QGIS, ArcGIS or their digital-twin platforms. Without that plug-and-play fit, even the most spectacular anomaly maps risk languishing outside a planner’s daily workflow.

Why now? Cost is a big part: a fully processed, AI-labelled scene often lands at a city desk for under US$30. Regulation is another. Europe’s new Nature Restoration Law, and similar rules elsewhere, will require quantifiable proof of green-space preservation and impervious-surface limits. Satellite-derived metrics satisfy auditors without putting inspectors on every street corner.

For mid-sized municipalities, the message is simple: the sky has turned into the most neutral, scalable and increasingly cheapest vantage point for auditing ground truth. Expect more city councils, even those without aerospace budgets, to subscribe to these “eye-in-the-sky” services, letting orbital data feed the next round of zoning, resilience and climate-action plans.

Get innovation insights from The FutureList weekly. Subscribe to our newsletter here